head to head · open source

cloudreve vs projectsend

cloudreve has 28,804 GitHub stars, 3,915 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. projectsend has 2,027 stars, 360 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cloudreve leads on adoption by 1,321% (28,804 vs 2,027 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; projectsend is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, projectsend 18%. projectsend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K projectsend ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve projectsend
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.0K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Go PHP
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 360
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick projectsend if

  • You want the projectsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and projectsend fits your workflow better

full projectsend profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About projectsend

ProjectSend is a self hosted, GPLv2 licensed PHP and MySQL application that lets you share files with clients from your own server, with each client signing in to a private page, and it is aimed at freelancers, agencies and teams who would rather not hand client documents to a third party service.

read the full projectsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or projectsend more popular?

cloudreve has 28,804 GitHub stars and projectsend has 2,027. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and projectsend free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and projectsend under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and projectsend?

cloudreve is written in Go and projectsend in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or projectsend?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,804 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose projectsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.