head to head · open source

pr-agent vs mantis

pr-agent has 13,074 GitHub stars, 1,864 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mantis has 1,665 stars, 160 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pr-agent leads on adoption by 685% (13,074 vs 1,665 stars). pr-agent is written in Python under MIT; mantis is written in Python under Apache-2.0. pr-agent has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, mantis 10%. pr-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pr-agent ★ 13K mantis ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pr-agent mantis
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pr-agent if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pr-agent profile →

pick mantis if

  • You want the mantis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and mantis fits your workflow better

full mantis profile →

About pr-agent

PR Agent is an open source, AI powered code review agent, maintained by the community as a legacy project of Qodo, for development teams that want automated pull request review running on their own infrastructure with their own model keys.

read the full pr-agent overview →

About mantis

Mantis is a modular, stack agnostic toolkit of security review skills for AI coding agents, and it includes an ADK reference harness for building secure software. It lives in the developer tools, AI coding agent, and application security ecosystem, with topics such as code review, DevSecOps, multi agent systems, and hardware security. The project helps agents autonomously find, reproduce, and patch vulnerabilities while giving humans a structured way to review results.

read the full mantis overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

pr-agent vs Gitea pr-agent vs Gogs pr-agent vs open-code-review pr-agent vs code-review-graph pr-agent vs Reflex pr-agent vs GitLab pr-agent vs GitButler pr-agent vs Coder pr-agent vs gitpod pr-agent vs Encore pr-agent vs reviewdog pr-agent vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is pr-agent or mantis more popular?

pr-agent has 13,074 GitHub stars and mantis has 1,665. pr-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are pr-agent and mantis free?

Both are open source. pr-agent is licensed under MIT and mantis under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pr-agent and mantis?

pr-agent is written in Python and mantis in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pr-agent or mantis?

Choose pr-agent if you want the larger community (13,074 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mantis if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.