head to head · open source

PocketBase vs Structr

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars, 3,688 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Structr has 830 stars, 161 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. PocketBase leads on adoption by 7,258% (61,070 vs 830 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; Structr is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Structr 19%. PocketBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (backend), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K Structr ★ 830 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase Structr
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 830
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick Structr if

  • You want the Structr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Structr fits your workflow better

full Structr profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About Structr

Structr is an open source, generic low code development and runtime platform built on a graph database, aimed at developers and teams who need to model, build, and operate fully custom applications rather than configure a prebuilt product.

read the full Structr overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs supabase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs TipTap PocketBase vs Directus PocketBase vs Budibase PocketBase vs Onlook PocketBase vs Teable PocketBase vs Convex PocketBase vs Alokai PocketBase vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or Structr more popular?

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars and Structr has 830. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and Structr free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT, and Structr has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between PocketBase and Structr?

PocketBase is written in Go and Structr in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or Structr?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,070 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Structr if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.