head to head · open source

archify vs PocketBase

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. PocketBase has 61,103 stars, 3,694 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. archify leads on adoption by 11% (67,632 vs 61,103 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; PocketBase is written in Go under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, PocketBase 6%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 68K PocketBase ★ 61K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify PocketBase
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 61K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.5K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick PocketBase if

  • You want the PocketBase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and PocketBase fits your workflow better

full PocketBase profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr archify vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or PocketBase more popular?

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars and PocketBase has 61,103. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and PocketBase free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and PocketBase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and PocketBase?

archify is written in JavaScript and PocketBase in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or PocketBase?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (67,632 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PocketBase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.