head to head · open source

archify vs lapce

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. lapce has 38,860 stars, 1,333 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped today. archify leads on adoption by 74% (67,632 vs 38,860 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 68K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify lapce
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 39K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.5K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or lapce more popular?

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,860. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and lapce free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and lapce?

archify is written in JavaScript and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or lapce?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (67,632 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.