head to head · open source

uppy vs PasswordPusher

uppy has 31,002 GitHub stars, 2,102 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. uppy leads on adoption by 868% (31,002 vs 3,202 stars). uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. uppy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uppy ★ 31K PasswordPusher ★ 3.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

uppy PasswordPusher
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 3.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uppy if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uppy profile →

pick PasswordPusher if

  • You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better

full PasswordPusher profile →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

About PasswordPusher

PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.

read the full PasswordPusher overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

uppy vs LocalSend uppy vs rclone uppy vs copyparty uppy vs Files uppy vs yazi uppy vs Spacedrive uppy vs Nextcloud uppy vs cloudreve uppy vs superfile uppy vs ranger uppy vs Seafile uppy vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is uppy or PasswordPusher more popular?

uppy has 31,002 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. uppy has the larger community by that measure.

Are uppy and PasswordPusher free?

Both are open source. uppy is licensed under MIT and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uppy and PasswordPusher?

uppy is written in TypeScript and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uppy or PasswordPusher?

Choose uppy if you want the larger community (31,002 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.