head to head · open source

ccpm vs paca

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars, 836 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. paca has 1,836 stars, 154 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ccpm leads on adoption by 356% (8,379 vs 1,836 stars). ccpm is written in Shell under MIT; paca is written in Go under Apache-2.0. ccpm has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, paca 8%. paca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (project-management), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ccpm ★ 8.4K paca ★ 1.8K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ccpm paca
GitHub stars ★ 8.4K ★ 1.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Shell Go
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 836 ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ccpm if

  • You weight community size — 8.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ccpm profile →

pick paca if

  • You want the paca feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and paca fits your workflow better

full paca profile →

About ccpm

CCPM is a project management skill system for AI coding agents that turns ideas into PRDs, PRDs into epics, epics into GitHub issues, and issues into production code via parallel agents running in Git worktrees, aimed at developers and teams doing agent assisted development on GitHub.

read the full ccpm overview →

About paca

Paca is a free, open source, self hosted, AI native project management platform in which human Scrum teams and AI agents work as equal teammates on the same board, the same sprints, and the same goals.

read the full paca overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

ccpm vs vibe-kanban ccpm vs Wekan ccpm vs qinglong ccpm vs edict ccpm vs OpenProject ccpm vs onedev ccpm vs Planka ccpm vs Leantime ccpm vs kanboard ccpm vs Kaneo ccpm vs Fizzy ccpm vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is ccpm or paca more popular?

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars and paca has 1,836. ccpm has the larger community by that measure.

Are ccpm and paca free?

Both are open source. ccpm is licensed under MIT and paca under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ccpm and paca?

ccpm is written in Shell and paca in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ccpm or paca?

Choose ccpm if you want the larger community (8,379 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose paca if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.