head to head · open source

Kaneo vs ccpm

Kaneo has 9,134 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ccpm has 8,379 stars, 836 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Kaneo leads on adoption by 9% (9,134 vs 8,379 stars). Kaneo is written in TypeScript under MIT; ccpm is written in Shell under MIT. Kaneo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ccpm 10%. Kaneo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (project-management), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kaneo ★ 9.1K ccpm ★ 8.4K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kaneo ccpm
GitHub stars ★ 9.1K ★ 8.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Shell
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-03-18
Forks ⑂ 800 ⑂ 836
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kaneo if

  • You weight community size — 9.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kaneo profile →

pick ccpm if

  • You want the ccpm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and ccpm fits your workflow better

full ccpm profile →

About Kaneo

Kaneo is an open source project management tool for development teams, published under the MIT license and written in TypeScript. It describes itself as "all you need, nothing you don't," and its README frames the design goal around restraint: the project's authors argue that the problem with most project management platforms is not a lack of features but an excess of them, where notifications, unnecessary buttons and complex workflows pull teams away from building products. Kaneo belongs to the self hosted project and work management ecosystem, and its topic list places it explicitly alongside issue trackers and…

read the full Kaneo overview →

About ccpm

CCPM is a project management skill system for AI coding agents that turns ideas into PRDs, PRDs into epics, epics into GitHub issues, and issues into production code via parallel agents running in Git worktrees, aimed at developers and teams doing agent assisted development on GitHub.

read the full ccpm overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

Kaneo vs vibe-kanban Kaneo vs Wekan Kaneo vs qinglong Kaneo vs edict Kaneo vs OpenProject Kaneo vs onedev Kaneo vs Planka Kaneo vs Leantime Kaneo vs kanboard Kaneo vs Fizzy Kaneo vs Backlog.md Kaneo vs taskwarrior

Frequently asked questions

Is Kaneo or ccpm more popular?

Kaneo has 9,134 GitHub stars and ccpm has 8,379. Kaneo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kaneo and ccpm free?

Both are open source. Kaneo is licensed under MIT and ccpm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kaneo and ccpm?

Kaneo is written in TypeScript and ccpm in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kaneo or ccpm?

Choose Kaneo if you want the larger community (9,134 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ccpm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.