head to head · open source
Planka vs ccpm
Planka has 12,666 GitHub stars, 1,397 forks, 425 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ccpm has 8,428 stars, 843 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. Planka leads on adoption by 50% (12,666 vs 8,428 stars). Planka is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ccpm is written in Shell under MIT. Planka has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ccpm 10%. Planka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (project-management), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Planka | ccpm | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 8.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 843 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Planka if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ccpm if
- You want the ccpm feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and ccpm fits your workflow better
About Planka
PLANKA Project mastering driven by fun Install · Demo · Docs · API · Cloud · Pro version PLANKA Pro When the whole team runs on PLANKA. Phones and tablets · five themes · a dashboard across every project · calendar, timeline and map views · cards on more than one board · templates · guest roles · SSO · PDF export. Self hosted exactly as you host it now, supported by the people who build it. Pro upgrades an existing Community installation in place — your database, your volume, your data. It is a real migration rather than a new image: Pro adds a Valkey service and a one off schema promote. The promote accepts…
read the full Planka overview →
About ccpm
CCPM – The Project Manager Agent Spec driven development for AI agents – ship faster better using PRDs, GitHub issues, and multiple agents running in parallel. Stop losing context. Stop blocking on tasks. Stop shipping bugs. CCPM gives your AI agent a structured PM brain: turn ideas into PRDs, PRDs into epics, epics into GitHub issues, and issues into production code — with full traceability at every step. [!IMPORTANT] 📢 CCPM is now an AGENT SKILL! It works with any Agent Skills–compatible harness that supports skills: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Factory, Amp, Cursor, and more. Table of Contents Background…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Planka or ccpm more popular?
Planka has 12,666 GitHub stars and ccpm has 8,428. Planka has the larger community by that measure.
Are Planka and ccpm free?
Both are open source. Planka has no licence declared in this registry, and ccpm is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Planka and ccpm?
Planka is written in JavaScript and ccpm in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Planka or ccpm?
Choose Planka if you want the larger community (12,666 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ccpm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.