head to head · open source

orm vs oxigraph

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. oxigraph has 1,924 stars, 177 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. orm leads on adoption by 2,376% (47,640 vs 1,924 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; oxigraph is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, oxigraph 9%. orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K oxigraph ★ 1.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm oxigraph
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 1.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 177
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick oxigraph if

  • You want the oxigraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and oxigraph fits your workflow better

full oxigraph profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About oxigraph

Oxigraph is an open source graph database and an RDF and SPARQL toolkit. It is written in Rust, released under the Apache 2.0 license, and lives in the RDF and SPARQL ecosystem. Its stated goal is to provide a compliant, safe, and fast graph database based on the RocksDB key value store, while also offering utilities for basic RDF manipulation and for building SPARQL implementations.

read the full oxigraph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or oxigraph more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and oxigraph has 1,924. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and oxigraph free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and oxigraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and oxigraph?

orm is written in TypeScript and oxigraph in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or oxigraph?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose oxigraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.