head to head · open source

orm vs juicefs

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. juicefs has 14,440 stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. orm leads on adoption by 230% (47,640 vs 14,440 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K juicefs ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or juicefs more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,440. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and juicefs free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and juicefs?

orm is written in TypeScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or juicefs?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.