head to head · open source

orm vs Conar

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Conar has 1,448 stars, 105 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped yesterday. orm leads on adoption by 3,190% (47,640 vs 1,448 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Conar is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Conar 7%. Conar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (database, mssql, mysql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K Conar ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm Conar
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 105
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick Conar if

  • You want the Conar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Conar fits your workflow better

full Conar profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About Conar

Conar is an AI powered open source database management project built for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, and Clickhouse, with support for other databases indicated as coming in the future. It lives in the TypeScript and AGPL 3.0 database management ecosystem, categorized under Infrastructure & Operations / Databases. It addresses the friction of working with multiple database systems while needing help writing and optimizing SQL queries. The README describes storing connections securely in the project’s cloud and asking AI to assist with SQL. It also describes encrypted connection strings and password protection, which…

read the full Conar overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or Conar more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and Conar has 1,448. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and Conar free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Conar under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and Conar?

orm is written in TypeScript and Conar in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or Conar?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Conar if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.