head to head · open source

orm vs Azimutt

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Azimutt has 2,183 stars, 141 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. orm leads on adoption by 2,082% (47,640 vs 2,183 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Azimutt is written in Elm under MIT. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Azimutt 6%. orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (database, mariadb, mongodb, mysql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K Azimutt ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm Azimutt
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Elm
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick Azimutt if

  • You want the Azimutt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Elm
  • You evaluated both and Azimutt fits your workflow better

full Azimutt profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About Azimutt

Azimutt is a full stack database exploration tool built in Elm and released under the MIT license. It presents itself as a next generation entity relationship diagram application for designing, exploring, documenting, and analyzing database schemas and data. The project lives in the database tooling ecosystem, positioned between ERD tools, data catalogs, and database clients.

read the full Azimutt overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or Azimutt more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and Azimutt has 2,183. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and Azimutt free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Azimutt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and Azimutt ?

orm is written in TypeScript and Azimutt in Elm. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or Azimutt ?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Azimutt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.