head to head · open source

OpenVPN vs WR.DO

OpenVPN has 14,562 GitHub stars, 3,398 forks, 226 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,280 stars, 365 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. OpenVPN leads on adoption by 539% (14,562 vs 2,280 stars). OpenVPN is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenVPN has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. OpenVPN was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenVPN ★ 15K WR.DO ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenVPN WR.DO
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 2.3K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in C TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 365
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenVPN if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenVPN profile →

pick WR.DO if

  • You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better

full WR.DO profile →

About OpenVPN

OpenVPN is open source VPN daemon. It provides secure tunneling for network connections. Project lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Networking & Connectivity ecosystem. Tagline says Zero Trust VPN solutions for secure business networking. GitHub description says OpenVPN is an open source VPN daemon. Repository language is C. GitHub license field says NOASSERTION, while README states GNU General Public License version 2. README states copyright 2002 2026 OpenVPN Inc.

read the full OpenVPN overview →

About WR.DO

WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.

read the full WR.DO overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenVPN or WR.DO more popular?

OpenVPN has 14,562 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,280. OpenVPN has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenVPN and WR.DO free?

Both are open source. OpenVPN has no licence declared in this registry, and WR.DO is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenVPN and WR.DO?

OpenVPN is written in C and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenVPN or WR.DO?

Choose OpenVPN if you want the larger community (14,562 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.