head to head · open source

open-code-review vs flow-next

open-code-review has 35,312 GitHub stars, 2,504 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped today. flow-next has 699 stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-code-review leads on adoption by 4,952% (35,312 vs 699 stars). open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. open-code-review has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, flow-next 8%. open-code-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-code-review ★ 35K flow-next ★ 699 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-code-review flow-next
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 699
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-code-review if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-code-review profile →

pick flow-next if

  • You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better

full flow-next profile →

About open-code-review

Open Code Review is an Apache 2.0, Go based AI code review CLI that reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM through a tool using agent, and returns line level review comments, built for developers and platform teams that want large scale review automated inside infrastructure they control.

read the full open-code-review overview →

About flow-next

Flow Next Agents generate. flow next proves. Implementation got cheap. Reviewing it, verifying it, and keeping a codebase coherent did not. Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside your coding agent. Give it the change you want and the rules your project follows. It turns that intent into specs, implementation, review, and pull requests with evidence. Your specs, decisions, and task state live in your repository. A real recorded run: plan, then cross model plan review (catches a missing guard, fix, SHIP), then implement plus tests, then impl review SHIP, ending on the receipt. Nothing staged; every frame i…

read the full flow-next overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs open-code-review gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler gogs vs code-review-graph opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

open-code-review vs Gitea open-code-review vs Gogs open-code-review vs code-review-graph open-code-review vs Reflex open-code-review vs GitLab open-code-review vs GitButler open-code-review vs Coder open-code-review vs gitpod open-code-review vs pr-agent open-code-review vs Encore open-code-review vs reviewdog open-code-review vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is open-code-review or flow-next more popular?

open-code-review has 35,312 GitHub stars and flow-next has 699. open-code-review has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-code-review and flow-next free?

Both are open source. open-code-review is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-code-review and flow-next?

open-code-review is written in Go and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-code-review or flow-next?

Choose open-code-review if you want the larger community (35,312 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.