head to head · open source

nx vs NHost

nx has 29,359 GitHub stars, 3,003 forks, 490 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NHost has 9,296 stars, 623 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nx leads on adoption by 216% (29,359 vs 9,296 stars). nx is written in TypeScript under MIT; NHost is written in Go under MIT. nx has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, NHost 7%. NHost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (javascript, nextjs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nx ★ 29K NHost ★ 9.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nx NHost
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 9.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 623
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nx if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nx profile →

pick NHost if

  • You want the NHost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and NHost fits your workflow better

full NHost profile →

About nx

Nx is an MIT licensed monorepo platform for TypeScript and polyglot codebases that caches unchanged work, runs only affected tasks, and ships an integrated CI solution aimed at both developers and autonomous AI agents.

read the full nx overview →

About NHost

Nhost is an open source backend as a service platform for modern application development, and the project describes itself as a Firebase alternative with GraphQL. It is built around PostgreSQL for data, Hasura for an instant GraphQL API, authentication, storage, and serverless functions written in Node.js with JavaScript or TypeScript. The project is distributed under the MIT license and is positioned in the developer tools category for build and deployment.

read the full NHost overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

nx vs vite nx vs webpack nx vs Appwrite nx vs parcel nx vs esbuild nx vs Harness nx vs Dokku nx vs turborepo nx vs NocoBase nx vs gradle nx vs rspack nx vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is nx or NHost more popular?

nx has 29,359 GitHub stars and NHost has 9,296. nx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nx and NHost free?

Both are open source. nx is licensed under MIT and NHost under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nx and NHost?

nx is written in TypeScript and NHost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nx or NHost?

Choose nx if you want the larger community (29,359 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NHost if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.