head to head · open source

turborepo vs nx

turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nx has 29,349 stars, 3,002 forks, 490 open issues and last shipped yesterday. turborepo leads on adoption by 6% (31,102 vs 29,349 stars). turborepo is written in Rust under MIT; nx is written in TypeScript under MIT. turborepo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, nx 10%. turborepo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (build-system, build-tool, javascript, monorepo), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

turborepo ★ 31K nx ★ 29K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

turborepo nx
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 29K
License MIT MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick turborepo if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full turborepo profile →

pick nx if

  • You want the nx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nx fits your workflow better

full nx profile →

About turborepo

Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, intended for teams that build many packages inside one repository and for the coding agents those teams run against it.

read the full turborepo overview →

About nx

Nx is an MIT licensed monorepo platform for TypeScript and polyglot codebases that caches unchanged work, runs only affected tasks, and ships an integrated CI solution aimed at both developers and autonomous AI agents.

read the full nx overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

turborepo vs vite turborepo vs webpack turborepo vs Appwrite turborepo vs parcel turborepo vs Harness turborepo vs Dokku turborepo vs NocoBase turborepo vs gradle turborepo vs rspack turborepo vs devbox turborepo vs xmake turborepo vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is turborepo or nx more popular?

turborepo has 31,102 GitHub stars and nx has 29,349. turborepo has the larger community by that measure.

Are turborepo and nx free?

Both are open source. turborepo is licensed under MIT and nx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between turborepo and nx?

turborepo is written in Rust and nx in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, turborepo or nx?

Choose turborepo if you want the larger community (31,102 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.