head to head · open source

nx vs rspack

nx has 29,349 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 490 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rspack has 12,906 stars, 854 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nx leads on adoption by 127% (29,349 vs 12,906 stars). nx is written in TypeScript under MIT; rspack is written in Rust under MIT. nx has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, rspack 7%. nx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (build-tool, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nx ★ 29K rspack ★ 13K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

nx rspack
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 854
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nx if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nx profile →

pick rspack if

  • You want the rspack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rspack fits your workflow better

full rspack profile →

About nx

Nx is an MIT licensed monorepo platform for TypeScript and polyglot codebases that caches unchanged work, runs only affected tasks, and ships an integrated CI solution aimed at both developers and autonomous AI agents.

read the full nx overview →

About rspack

Rspack is a fast bundler for the web written in Rust, distributed under the MIT license. It modernizes the webpack API so that webpack configurations can be replaced seamlessly, while the Rust core delivers fast build speeds. The project lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript build tooling ecosystem, and it is part of Rstack, a unified JavaScript toolchain that also includes Rsbuild, Rslib, Rspress, Rsdoctor, Rstest, and Rslint. The repository carries the topics build tool, bundler, compiler, esm, javascript, jsx, loaders, module bundler, rspack, rstack, rust, and typescript.

read the full rspack overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs nx vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

nx vs vite nx vs webpack nx vs Appwrite nx vs parcel nx vs Harness nx vs Dokku nx vs turborepo nx vs NocoBase nx vs gradle nx vs devbox nx vs xmake nx vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is nx or rspack more popular?

nx has 29,349 GitHub stars and rspack has 12,906. nx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nx and rspack free?

Both are open source. nx is licensed under MIT and rspack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nx and rspack?

nx is written in TypeScript and rspack in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nx or rspack?

Choose nx if you want the larger community (29,349 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rspack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.