head to head · open source

NocoDB vs workout-cool

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. workout-cool has 8,481 stars, 747 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 666% (65,002 vs 8,481 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; workout-cool is written in TypeScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, workout-cool 9%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K workout-cool ★ 8.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB workout-cool
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 8.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-31
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 747
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick workout-cool if

  • You want the workout-cool feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and workout-cool fits your workflow better

full workout-cool profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About workout-cool

Workout.cool is an open source, MIT licensed fitness coaching platform built in TypeScript on Next.js, React, and PostgreSQL that lets coaches and individuals create workout plans, track training progress, and browse a large exercise database.

read the full workout-cool overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or workout-cool more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and workout-cool has 8,481. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and workout-cool free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and workout-cool is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and workout-cool?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and workout-cool in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or workout-cool?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose workout-cool if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.