head to head · open source
NocoDB vs ubicloud
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ubicloud has 12,267 stars, 587 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped today. NocoDB leads on adoption by 430% (65,002 vs 12,267 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ubicloud is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ubicloud 5%. ubicloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | ubicloud | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 12K |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 587 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ubicloud if
- You want the ubicloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and ubicloud fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About ubicloud
Ubicloud is an open source cloud platform that delivers IaaS features — elastic compute, non replicated block storage, firewall and load balancer, managed Postgres, Kubernetes, AI inference, and IAM services — on bare metal hardware, for teams that want public cloud convenience without closed source lock in or premium rental pricing.
read the full ubicloud overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or ubicloud more popular?
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and ubicloud has 12,267. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and ubicloud free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and ubicloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and ubicloud?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and ubicloud in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or ubicloud?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ubicloud if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.