head to head · open source

NocoDB vs tile38

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. tile38 has 9,732 stars, 622 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 568% (65,002 vs 9,732 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; tile38 is written in Go under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, tile38 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K tile38 ★ 9.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB tile38
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 9.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-02
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 622
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick tile38 if

  • You want the tile38 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and tile38 fits your workflow better

full tile38 profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About tile38

Tile38 is an open source, MIT licensed, in memory geolocation data store and spatial index that doubles as a realtime geofencing server, written in Go and aimed at developers who need to store, query, and react to location data in real time.

read the full tile38 overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or tile38 more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and tile38 has 9,732. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and tile38 free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and tile38 is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and tile38?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and tile38 in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or tile38?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose tile38 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.