head to head · open source
NocoDB vs shardingsphere-elasticjob
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. shardingsphere-elasticjob has 8,197 stars, 3,248 forks, 116 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 698% (65,408 vs 8,197 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; shardingsphere-elasticjob is written in Java under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, shardingsphere-elasticjob 40%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | shardingsphere-elasticjob | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 8.2K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 3.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick shardingsphere-elasticjob if
- You want the shardingsphere-elasticjob feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and shardingsphere-elasticjob fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About shardingsphere-elasticjob
ElasticJob Distributed scheduled job Official website: Through the functions of flexible scheduling, resource management and job management, it creates a distributed scheduling solution suitable for Internet scenarios, and provides a diversified job ecosystem through open architecture design. It uses a unified job API for each project. Developers only need code one time and can deploy at will. ElasticJob became an Apache ShardingSphere Sub project on May 28 2020. You are welcome to communicate with the community via the mailing list. Introduction Using ElasticJob developers can no longer worry about the non…
read the full shardingsphere-elasticjob overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or shardingsphere-elasticjob more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and shardingsphere-elasticjob has 8,197. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and shardingsphere-elasticjob free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and shardingsphere-elasticjob is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and shardingsphere-elasticjob?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and shardingsphere-elasticjob in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or shardingsphere-elasticjob?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose shardingsphere-elasticjob if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.