head to head · open source

NocoDB vs redka

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. redka has 4,568 stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,323% (65,002 vs 4,568 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; redka is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, redka 3%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K redka ★ 4.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB redka
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 4.6K
License Custom / other BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-02-04
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 135
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick redka if

  • You want the redka feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and redka fits your workflow better

full redka profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About redka

Redka reimplements the core parts of Redis in SQL while staying compatible with the Redis API, aimed at Go developers and teams who want Redis style data structures without running a separate Redis server or holding all data in RAM.

read the full redka overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or redka more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and redka has 4,568. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and redka free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and redka is licensed under BSD-3-Clause. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and redka?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and redka in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or redka?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose redka if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.