head to head · open source
NocoDB vs redka
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. redka has 4,567 stars, 136 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,332% (65,408 vs 4,567 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; redka is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, redka 3%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | redka | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 4.6K |
| License | Custom / other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 136 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick redka if
- You want the redka feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and redka fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About redka
Redka reimplements the core parts of Redis with SQL, while remaining compatible with Redis API. Highlights: Data doesn't have to fit in RAM. Supports ACID transactions. SQL views for easier analysis and reporting. Uses SQLite or PostgreSQL as a backend. Runs in process (Go API) or as a standalone server. Implements Redis commands and wire protocol (RESP). Redka is stable and ready to use for testing and non critical production scenarios. It's currently in maintenance mode, and no new features are planned. Use cases Here are some situations where Redka might be helpful: Embedded cache for Go applications . If…
read the full redka overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or redka more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and redka has 4,567. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and redka free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and redka is licensed under BSD-3-Clause. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and redka?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and redka in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or redka?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose redka if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.