head to head · open source
NocoDB vs rainfrog
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rainfrog has 5,391 stars, 98 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,113% (65,408 vs 5,391 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; rainfrog is written in Rust under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rainfrog 2%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | rainfrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 5.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 98 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rainfrog if
- You want the rainfrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and rainfrog fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About rainfrog
🐸 rainfrog a database tool for the terminal [![Crate Badge]][Crate] [![Repo Badge]][Repo] [![License Badge]](./LICENSE) \ [![CI Badge]][CI] features the goal for rainfrog is to provide a lightweight, terminal based tool for interacting with databases. efficient navigation via vim like keybindings and mouse controls query editor with keyword highlighting, session history, and favorites quickly copy data, filter tables, and switch between schemas shortcuts to view table metadata and properties cross platform (macOS, linux, windows, android via termux) why "rainfrog"? frogs find refuge in elephant tracks supported…
read the full rainfrog overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or rainfrog more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and rainfrog has 5,391. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and rainfrog free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and rainfrog is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and rainfrog?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and rainfrog in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or rainfrog?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose rainfrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.