head to head · open source
NocoDB vs ProxyPool
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxyPool has 6,262 stars, 2,230 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 945% (65,408 vs 6,262 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ProxyPool is written in Python under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ProxyPool 36%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | ProxyPool | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 2.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ProxyPool if
- You want the ProxyPool feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and ProxyPool fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About ProxyPool
ProxyPool 简易高效的代理池，提供如下功能： 定时抓取免费代理网站，简易可扩展。 使用 Redis 对代理进行存储并对代理可用性进行排序。 定时测试和筛选，剔除不可用代理，留下可用代理。 提供代理 API，随机取用测试通过的可用代理。 代理池原理解析可见「如何搭建一个高效的代理池」，建议使用之前阅读。 使用前注意 本代理池是基于市面上各种公开代理源搭建的，所以可用性并不高，很可能上百上千个代理中才能找到一两个可用代理，不适合直接用于爬虫爬取任务。 如果您的目的是为了尽快使用代理完成爬取任务，建议您对接一些付费代理或者直接使用已有代理资源；如果您的目的是为了学习如何搭建一个代理池，您可以参考本项目继续完成后续步骤。 付费代理推荐： ADSL 拨号代理：海量拨号（中国境内）高质量代理 海外/全球代理：中国境外高质量代理 蜂窝 4G/5G 代理：极高质量（中国境内）防风控代理 使用准备 首先当然是克隆代码并进入 ProxyPool 文件夹： 然后选用下面 Docker 和常规方式任意一个执行即可。 使用要求 可以通过两种方式来运行代理池，一种方式是使用 Docker（推荐），另一种方式是常规方式运行，要求如下： Docker 如果使用 Docker，则需要安装如下环境： Docker Docker Compose 安装方法自行搜索即可。 官方 Docker Hub 镜像：germey/proxypool 常规方式…
read the full ProxyPool overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or ProxyPool more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and ProxyPool has 6,262. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and ProxyPool free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and ProxyPool is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and ProxyPool?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and ProxyPool in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or ProxyPool?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ProxyPool if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.