head to head · open source

NocoDB vs orbitdb

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. orbitdb has 8,808 stars, 595 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 638% (65,002 vs 8,808 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; orbitdb is written in JavaScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, orbitdb 7%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K orbitdb ★ 8.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB orbitdb
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 8.8K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-14
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 595
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick orbitdb if

  • You want the orbitdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and orbitdb fits your workflow better

full orbitdb profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About orbitdb

OrbitDB is a serverless, distributed, peer to peer database for the decentralized web that stores its data in IPFS and syncs it with peers over Libp2p Pubsub, and it is aimed at developers building decentralized, blockchain, and local first applications in JavaScript.

read the full orbitdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or orbitdb more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and orbitdb has 8,808. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and orbitdb free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and orbitdb is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and orbitdb?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and orbitdb in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or orbitdb?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose orbitdb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.