head to head · open source
NocoDB vs mikro-orm
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mikro-orm has 9,264 stars, 699 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 606% (65,408 vs 9,264 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mikro-orm is written in TypeScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, mikro-orm 8%. mikro-orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | mikro-orm | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 9.3K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 699 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mikro-orm if
- You want the mikro-orm feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and mikro-orm fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About mikro-orm
TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL (including CockroachDB and PGlite), SQLite (including libSQL), MSSQL and Oracle databases. Heavily inspired by Doctrine and Hibernate. Quick Start Install a driver package for your database: If you use additional packages like @mikro orm/cli , @mikro orm/migrations , or @mikro orm/entity generator , install @mikro orm/core explicitly as well. See the quick start guide for details. Define Entities The recommended way to define entities is using defineEntity with setClass : You can…
read the full mikro-orm overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or mikro-orm more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and mikro-orm has 9,264. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and mikro-orm free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and mikro-orm is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and mikro-orm?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and mikro-orm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or mikro-orm?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mikro-orm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.