head to head · open source
NocoDB vs mikro-orm
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mikro-orm has 9,231 stars, 673 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. NocoDB leads on adoption by 604% (65,002 vs 9,231 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mikro-orm is written in TypeScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, mikro-orm 7%. mikro-orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | mikro-orm | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 673 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mikro-orm if
- You want the mikro-orm feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and mikro-orm fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About mikro-orm
MikroORM is a TypeScript ORM for Node.js built on the Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns, aimed at TypeScript teams that want typed, entity based persistence across MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, MS SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Oracle and SQLite/libSQL databases.
read the full mikro-orm overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or mikro-orm more popular?
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and mikro-orm has 9,231. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and mikro-orm free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and mikro-orm is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and mikro-orm?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and mikro-orm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or mikro-orm?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mikro-orm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.