head to head · open source
NocoDB vs m_flow
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. m_flow has 4,504 stars, 258 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,343% (64,998 vs 4,504 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; m_flow is written in Python under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, m_flow 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | m_flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 258 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick m_flow if
- You want the m_flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and m_flow fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About m_flow
M flow is a Python bio inspired cognitive memory engine positioned as a new paradigm for Graph RAG. It lives in the LLM retrieval and agent memory ecosystem, as a database like component for knowledge graphs, episodic memory, long term memory, and MCP workflows.
read the full m_flow overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or m_flow more popular?
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and m_flow has 4,504. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and m_flow free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and m_flow is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and m_flow?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and m_flow in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or m_flow?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose m_flow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.