head to head · open source
NocoDB vs m_flow
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. m_flow has 4,511 stars, 256 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,350% (65,408 vs 4,511 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; m_flow is written in Python under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, m_flow 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | m_flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 256 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick m_flow if
- You want the m_flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and m_flow fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About m_flow
M flow RAG matches chunks. GraphRAG structures context. M flow scores evidence paths. Retrieval through reasoning and association — M flow operates like a cognitive memory system. m flow.ai · flowelement.ai · Quick Start · Architecture · Examples · OpenClaw Skill · Contact What is M flow? The real shift is not whether a system builds a graph, but what the graph is allowed to do at retrieval time. Graph topology encodes relevance. In most RAG systems, retrieval is still dominated by similarity: the query is embedded, textual units are ranked by vector distance, and structure—if present—mainly helps organize…
read the full m_flow overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or m_flow more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and m_flow has 4,511. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and m_flow free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and m_flow is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and m_flow?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and m_flow in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or m_flow?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose m_flow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.