head to head · open source
NocoDB vs JSqlParser
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JSqlParser has 5,971 stars, 1,446 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 995% (65,408 vs 5,971 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; JSqlParser is written in Java under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, JSqlParser 24%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | JSqlParser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 6.0K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick JSqlParser if
- You want the JSqlParser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and JSqlParser fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About JSqlParser
JSqlParser Turn any SQL statement into a traversable tree of Java objects and back again. An RDBMS agnostic SQL parser for the JVM: one grammar, twelve dialects, no native extensions. Website · Samples · Syntax · Change Log · Contributing What it does Give it SQL. Get an AST you can walk, rewrite, and print back out. The tree is traversable with the Visitor pattern, and the same object model works in reverse: build statements from Java with a fluent API and render them as SQL text. Install Use the stable Manticore builds . They are released continuously from the current development line and carry all of the…
read the full JSqlParser overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or JSqlParser more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and JSqlParser has 5,971. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and JSqlParser free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and JSqlParser is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and JSqlParser?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and JSqlParser in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or JSqlParser?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose JSqlParser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.