head to head · open source

NocoDB vs hugegraph

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hugegraph has 3,182 stars, 636 forks, 373 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,943% (64,998 vs 3,182 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; hugegraph is written in Java under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, hugegraph 20%. hugegraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K hugegraph ★ 3.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB hugegraph
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 3.2K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 636
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick hugegraph if

  • You want the hugegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and hugegraph fits your workflow better

full hugegraph profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About hugegraph

Apache HugeGraph is a graph database written in Java and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Apache ecosystem and stores vertices and edges for graph traversal workloads. The project includes an OLTP engine, a REST API, and pluggable backend stores. The repository tagline states support for more than 100+ billion data, while the README excerpt states support for more than 10 billion vertices and edges.

read the full hugegraph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or hugegraph more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and hugegraph has 3,182. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and hugegraph free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and hugegraph is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and hugegraph?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and hugegraph in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or hugegraph?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose hugegraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.