head to head · open source
NocoDB vs GreptimeDB
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GreptimeDB has 6,680 stars, 543 forks, 264 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 873% (64,998 vs 6,680 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; GreptimeDB is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, GreptimeDB 8%. GreptimeDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | GreptimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 6.7K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 543 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GreptimeDB if
- You want the GreptimeDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and GreptimeDB fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About GreptimeDB
GreptimeDB is an open source observability database built on a single columnar engine that stores metrics, logs, and traces together. It lives in the cloud native infrastructure and operations ecosystem, written in Rust and licensed under Apache 2.0. All three signal types share one table model composed of tags, a timestamp, and fields, so when signals carry common identifiers such as service, host, or trace ID, they can be correlated in SQL without moving data between separate databases. Compute and storage are disaggregated: object storage holds the data while memory and local disk caches keep recent and freque…
read the full GreptimeDB overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or GreptimeDB more popular?
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and GreptimeDB has 6,680. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and GreptimeDB free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and GreptimeDB is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and GreptimeDB?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and GreptimeDB in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or GreptimeDB?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose GreptimeDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.