head to head · open source

NocoDB vs GRDB.swift

NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GRDB.swift has 8,721 stars, 1,097 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 650% (65,408 vs 8,721 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; GRDB.swift is written in Swift under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, GRDB.swift 13%. GRDB.swift was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K GRDB.swift ★ 8.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB GRDB.swift
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 8.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick GRDB.swift if

  • You want the GRDB.swift feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and GRDB.swift fits your workflow better

full GRDB.swift profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…

read the full NocoDB overview →

About GRDB.swift

A toolkit for SQLite databases, with a focus on application development Proudly serving the community since 2015 Latest release : June 18, 2026 • version 7.11.1 • CHANGELOG • Migrating From GRDB 6 to GRDB 7 Requirements : iOS 13.0+ / macOS 10.15+ / tvOS 13.0+ / watchOS 7.0+ • SQLite 3.20.0+ • Swift 6.1+ / Xcode 16.3+ Contact : Release announcements and usage tips: follow @groue@hachyderm.io on Mastodon. Report bugs in a Github issue. Make sure you check the existing issues first. A question? Looking for advice? Do you wonder how to contribute? Fancy a chat? Go to the GitHub discussions, or the GRDB…

read the full GRDB.swift overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or GRDB.swift more popular?

NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and GRDB.swift has 8,721. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and GRDB.swift free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and GRDB.swift is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and GRDB.swift?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and GRDB.swift in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or GRDB.swift?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose GRDB.swift if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.