head to head · open source
NocoDB vs FreeSql
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FreeSql has 4,406 stars, 910 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,385% (65,408 vs 4,406 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; FreeSql is written in C# under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, FreeSql 21%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | FreeSql | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 910 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FreeSql if
- You want the FreeSql feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and FreeSql fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About FreeSql
🦄 FreeSql, The First AOT ORM! FreeSql is a powerful O/RM component, supports .NET Core 2.1+, .NET Framework 4.0+, Xamarin, And AOT. English 中文 🛠 Support CodeFirst data migration. 💻 Support DbFirst import entity class from database, or use Generation Tool. ⛳ Support advanced type mapping, such as PostgreSQL array type, etc. 🌲 Support expression functions, and customizable analysis. 🏁 Support one to many and many to many navigation properties, include and lazy loading. 📃 Support Read/Write separation, Splitting Table/Database, Global filters, Optimistic and pessimistic locker. 🌳 Support
read the full FreeSql overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or FreeSql more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and FreeSql has 4,406. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and FreeSql free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and FreeSql is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and FreeSql?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and FreeSql in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or FreeSql?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FreeSql if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.