head to head · open source

NocoDB vs FerretDB

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FerretDB has 11,070 stars, 488 forks, 448 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 487% (65,002 vs 11,070 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; FerretDB is written in Go under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, FerretDB 4%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacktoberfest, postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K FerretDB ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB FerretDB
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 11K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-05
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 488
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick FerretDB if

  • You want the FerretDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and FerretDB fits your workflow better

full FerretDB profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About FerretDB

FerretDB is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed proxy written in Go that converts MongoDB 5.0+ wire protocol queries into SQL and stores the data in PostgreSQL with the DocumentDB extension, giving developers a drop in MongoDB compatible document database without MongoDB's SSPL licence.

read the full FerretDB overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or FerretDB more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and FerretDB has 11,070. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and FerretDB free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and FerretDB is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and FerretDB?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and FerretDB in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or FerretDB?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FerretDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.