head to head · open source

NocoDB vs electric-pglite

NocoDB has 65,516 GitHub stars, 5,136 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. electric-pglite has 16,268 stars, 475 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 303% (65,516 vs 16,268 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; electric-pglite is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, electric-pglite 3%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 66K electric-pglite ★ 16K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB electric-pglite
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 16K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-12 2026-11-10
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 475
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick electric-pglite if

  • You want the electric-pglite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and electric-pglite fits your workflow better

full electric-pglite profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…

read the full NocoDB overview →

About electric-pglite

PGlite the WASM build of Postgres from Electric . Build reactive, realtime, local first apps directly on Postgres. PGlite Postgres in WASM PGlite is a WASM Postgres build packaged into a TypeScript client library that enables you to run Postgres in the browser, Node.js, Bun and Deno, with no need to install any other dependencies. It is only 3mb gzipped and has support for many Postgres extensions, including pgvector and PostGIS. It can be used as an ephemeral in memory database, or with persistence either to the file system (Node/Bun/Deno) or indexedDB (Browser). Unlike previous "Postgres in the browser"…

read the full electric-pglite overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or electric-pglite more popular?

NocoDB has 65,516 GitHub stars and electric-pglite has 16,268. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and electric-pglite free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and electric-pglite is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and electric-pglite?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and electric-pglite in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or electric-pglite?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,516 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose electric-pglite if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.