head to head · open source

NocoDB vs dbal

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dbal has 9,707 stars, 1,377 forks, 304 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 570% (65,002 vs 9,707 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; dbal is written in PHP under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, dbal 14%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K dbal ★ 9.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB dbal
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 9.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick dbal if

  • You want the dbal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and dbal fits your workflow better

full dbal profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About dbal

Doctrine DBAL is an MIT licensed PHP database abstraction layer, maintained as part of the Doctrine project, that provides one API for database schema introspection and schema management across IBM Db2, MariaDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server and SQLite — and it is aimed at PHP developers and teams that must write database code portable across those engines instead of hand writing driver specific SQL for each one.

read the full dbal overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or dbal more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and dbal has 9,707. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and dbal free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and dbal is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and dbal?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and dbal in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or dbal?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose dbal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.