head to head · open source

NocoDB vs crystal

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crystal has 12,931 stars, 625 forks, 169 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 403% (65,002 vs 12,931 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; crystal is written in TypeScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, crystal 5%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (automatic-api), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K crystal ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB crystal
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 13K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 625
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick crystal if

  • You want the crystal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and crystal fits your workflow better

full crystal profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About crystal

Graphile's Crystal is a TypeScript monorepo of MIT licensed GraphQL tooling for the Node.js and PostgreSQL ecosystems, aimed at developers who want an auto generated, high performance GraphQL API over a PostgreSQL database or a faster execution engine for a GraphQL.js schema they already own.

read the full crystal overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or crystal more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and crystal has 12,931. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and crystal free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and crystal is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and crystal?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and crystal in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or crystal?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose crystal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.