head to head · open source

NocoDB vs cassandra

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cassandra has 10,096 stars, 4,118 forks, 529 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 544% (65,002 vs 10,096 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; cassandra is written in Java under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, cassandra 41%. cassandra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K cassandra ★ 10K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB cassandra
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 10K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 4.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick cassandra if

  • You want the cassandra feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cassandra fits your workflow better

full cassandra profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About cassandra

Apache Cassandra is an open source transactional distributed database written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, for users who need linear scalability and proven fault tolerance on commodity hardware or cloud infrastructure without compromising performance.

read the full cassandra overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or cassandra more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and cassandra has 10,096. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and cassandra free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and cassandra is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and cassandra?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and cassandra in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or cassandra?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cassandra if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.