head to head · open source
NocoDB vs Blog.Core
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Blog.Core has 5,284 stars, 1,423 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,138% (65,408 vs 5,284 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Blog.Core is written in C# under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Blog.Core 27%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | Blog.Core | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 5.3K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-04-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Blog.Core if
- You want the Blog.Core feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Blog.Core fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About Blog.Core
Blog.Core English 简体中文 Star History Blog.Core 开箱即用的企业级前后端分离【 .NET Core6.0 Api + Vue 2.x + RBAC】权限框架。 其他版本看具体分支吧🎉 官网： 已被近100家公司所使用(🐱🚀)：点击查看列表 欢迎盖楼，留下公司真实名字的，可得定制化指导服务。 同时如果企业有付费咨询，欢迎联系老张（QQ：3143422472）。 核心项目组成员（排名不分先后） hudingwen、LemonNoCry、、Jamnine何拾玖、 ❤ 真实用户反馈 ❤ 给个星星! ⭐️ 如果你喜欢这个项目或者它帮助你, 请给 Star 如果你的项目中借鉴了本项目，请稍微说明下 功能与进度 企业使用高级版本 [x] 包含开源版 框架模块/组件模块 中的所有功能； [x] 全部表结构主键底层架构改成 string 类型（默认雪花，支持guid），更方便迁移； [x] 完善部门数据权限，可以基于策略配置查看数据范围； [x] 优化权限处理器，解决多实例分布式下，权限不同步问题（必须配置Redis）； [x] 增加在线用户查看功能，并实现强制用户下线功能（必须配置Redis）； [x] 增加用户黑名单功能（必须配置Redis）； [x] 增加岗位功能（单独建表），配合部门使用； [ ] 后期优化站内通知功能，其实目前已经有SignalR来实现消息推送了，可以直接用；…
read the full Blog.Core overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or Blog.Core more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and Blog.Core has 5,284. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and Blog.Core free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and Blog.Core is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and Blog.Core?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and Blog.Core in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or Blog.Core?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Blog.Core if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.