head to head · open source

NocoDB vs aleph

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aleph has 2,432 stars, 362 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 2,573% (64,998 vs 2,432 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; aleph is written in JavaScript under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, aleph 15%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K aleph ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB aleph
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 2.4K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-02-20
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 362
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick aleph if

  • You want the aleph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and aleph fits your workflow better

full aleph profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About aleph

Aleph is an MIT licensed open source search and browsing tool for large collections of documents and structured data. It indexes PDF, Word, HTML, CSV, XLS, and SQL inputs so users can search mixed evidence sources in one tool. The project lives in the open source data search, graph database, investigative journalism, and OSINT ecosystem, and it is built with investigative reporting as a primary use case.

read the full aleph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or aleph more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and aleph has 2,432. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and aleph free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and aleph is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and aleph?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and aleph in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or aleph?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose aleph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.