head to head · open source
NocoDB vs activegraph
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. activegraph has 1,405 stars, 273 forks, 242 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 4,526% (64,998 vs 1,405 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; activegraph is written in Ruby under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, activegraph 19%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | activegraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 273 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick activegraph if
- You want the activegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and activegraph fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About activegraph
activegraph is a Ruby and JRuby wrapper for the Neo4j graph database, formerly called Neo4j.rb. It provides an Active Model compliant wrapper over Neo4j, so Ruby applications can work with graph data through model code and associations instead of writing low level database calls. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and sits in the database and infrastructure category, with topics that include graph database, neo4j, orm, railtie, and ruby.
read the full activegraph overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or activegraph more popular?
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and activegraph has 1,405. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and activegraph free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and activegraph is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and activegraph?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and activegraph in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or activegraph?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose activegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.