head to head · open source

nginx vs WR.DO

nginx has 31,681 GitHub stars, 8,302 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. WR.DO has 2,279 stars, 364 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. nginx leads on adoption by 1,290% (31,681 vs 2,279 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. nginx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K WR.DO ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx WR.DO
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.3K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 364
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick WR.DO if

  • You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better

full WR.DO profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About WR.DO

WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.

read the full WR.DO overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do immich vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns nginx vs sliver nginx vs smartdns nginx vs OpenSurge-for-Mac

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or WR.DO more popular?

nginx has 31,681 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,279. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and WR.DO free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and WR.DO?

nginx is written in C and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or WR.DO?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,681 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.