head to head · open source

nginx vs SoftEtherVPN

nginx has 31,683 GitHub stars, 8,304 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,562 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. nginx leads on adoption by 134% (31,683 vs 13,562 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 21%. nginx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 14K
License BSD-2-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in C C
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs nginx-proxy nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns nginx vs sliver nginx vs smartdns

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

nginx has 31,683 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,562. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and SoftEtherVPN?

nginx is written in C and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,683 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.