head to head · open source

nginx vs numa

nginx has 31,746 GitHub stars, 8,311 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped yesterday. numa has 1,513 stars, 107 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nginx leads on adoption by 1,998% (31,746 vs 1,513 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; numa is written in Rust under MIT. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, numa 7%. nginx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K numa ★ 1.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx numa
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.5K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick numa if

  • You want the numa feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and numa fits your workflow better

full numa profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About numa

numa is a portable DNS resolver written in Rust and shipped as a single roughly 8 MB binary, aimed at developers, self hosters and privacy conscious laptop users who want ad blocking, .numa local service names, hostname overrides and ODoH encrypted upstream queries without a cloud account or a Raspberry Pi.

read the full numa overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs nginx frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs nginx-proxy nginx vs goproxy nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs cloudflared nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or numa more popular?

nginx has 31,746 GitHub stars and numa has 1,513. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and numa free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and numa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and numa?

nginx is written in C and numa in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or numa?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,746 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose numa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.