head to head · open source

nginx vs DNS-collector

nginx has 31,802 GitHub stars, 8,309 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. DNS-collector has 570 stars, 89 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. nginx leads on adoption by 5,479% (31,802 vs 570 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; DNS-collector is written in Go under MIT. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, DNS-collector 16%. DNS-collector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K DNS-collector ★ 570 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx DNS-collector
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 570
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 89
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick DNS-collector if

  • You want the DNS-collector feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and DNS-collector fits your workflow better

full DNS-collector profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About DNS-collector

DNS collector is a lightweight, open source DNS telemetry pipeline in Go that captures queries and responses from DNS servers and forwards normalized, enriched events to monitoring, analytics, and security systems.

read the full DNS-collector overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs nginx frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs nginx-proxy nginx vs goproxy nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs cloudflared nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or DNS-collector more popular?

nginx has 31,802 GitHub stars and DNS-collector has 570. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and DNS-collector free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and DNS-collector under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and DNS-collector?

nginx is written in C and DNS-collector in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or DNS-collector?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,802 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose DNS-collector if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.