head to head · open source

nginx vs acme-dns

nginx has 31,725 GitHub stars, 8,310 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped yesterday. acme-dns has 2,832 stars, 304 forks, 192 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. nginx leads on adoption by 1,020% (31,725 vs 2,832 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; acme-dns is written in Go under MIT. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, acme-dns 11%. nginx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K acme-dns ★ 2.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx acme-dns
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.8K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-06-08
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 304
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick acme-dns if

  • You want the acme-dns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and acme-dns fits your workflow better

full acme-dns profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About acme-dns

acme dns is a limited, self hosted DNS server written in Go that exposes a RESTful HTTP API for updating TXT records, letting operators automate ACME DNS 01 challenges without handing broad DNS control to their automation.

read the full acme-dns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs nginx frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs nginx-proxy nginx vs goproxy nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs cloudflared nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or acme-dns more popular?

nginx has 31,725 GitHub stars and acme-dns has 2,832. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and acme-dns free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and acme-dns under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and acme-dns?

nginx is written in C and acme-dns in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or acme-dns?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,725 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose acme-dns if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.