head to head · open source

nginx-proxy vs SoftEtherVPN

nginx-proxy has 19,915 GitHub stars, 3,044 forks, 327 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,571 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. nginx-proxy leads on adoption by 47% (19,915 vs 13,571 stars). nginx-proxy is written in Python under MIT; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. nginx-proxy has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 20%. nginx-proxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx-proxy ★ 20K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx-proxy SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx-proxy if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx-proxy profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About nginx-proxy

nginx proxy is an automated Nginx reverse proxy for Docker that watches containers start and stop and rewrites its own proxy configuration in response, and it is for anyone running containerised services who needs hostname based routing without hand editing nginx configuration files.

read the full nginx-proxy overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx-proxy vs frp nginx-proxy vs caddy nginx-proxy vs traefik nginx-proxy vs AdGuardHome nginx-proxy vs nginx nginx-proxy vs algo nginx-proxy vs goproxy nginx-proxy vs openvpn-install nginx-proxy vs amnezia-client nginx-proxy vs OpenVPN nginx-proxy vs coredns nginx-proxy vs sliver

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx-proxy or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

nginx-proxy has 19,915 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,571. nginx-proxy has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx-proxy and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. nginx-proxy is licensed under MIT and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx-proxy and SoftEtherVPN?

nginx-proxy is written in Python and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx-proxy or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose nginx-proxy if you want the larger community (19,915 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.