head to head · open source

rclone vs nging

rclone has 60,170 GitHub stars, 5,487 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nging has 1,594 stars, 223 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 3,675% (60,170 vs 1,594 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; nging is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, nging 14%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K nging ★ 1.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone nging
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 1.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-10-07 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 223
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick nging if

  • You want the nging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and nging fits your workflow better

full nging profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About nging

Nging is a self hosted website server administration panel written in Go for sysadmins and self hosters who need to manage Caddy and Nginx sites, databases, scheduled tasks, and network tooling from one web interface across Windows, Linux, macOS, and ARM devices.

read the full nging overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or nging more popular?

rclone has 60,170 GitHub stars and nging has 1,594. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and nging free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and nging under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and nging?

rclone is written in Go and nging in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or nging?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (60,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nging if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.