head to head · open source

NocoDB vs neo4j

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. neo4j has 17,241 stars, 2,703 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 277% (64,998 vs 17,241 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; neo4j is written in Java under GPL-3.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, neo4j 16%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K neo4j ★ 17K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB neo4j
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 17K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick neo4j if

  • You want the neo4j feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and neo4j fits your workflow better

full neo4j profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About neo4j

Neo4j is a Java graph database released under GPL 3.0 that stores data as nodes and relationships and queries it with Cypher, aimed at developers, data engineers, and platform teams building connected data applications who would otherwise model those relationships as tables and joins.

read the full neo4j overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or neo4j more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and neo4j has 17,241. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and neo4j free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and neo4j is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and neo4j?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and neo4j in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or neo4j?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose neo4j if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.