head to head · open source

Mole vs disky

Mole has 67,838 GitHub stars, 2,386 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. disky has 952 stars, 39 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Mole leads on adoption by 7,026% (67,838 vs 952 stars). Mole is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; disky is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Mole has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, disky 4%. Mole was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mole ★ 68K disky ★ 952 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mole disky
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 952
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Shell Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-05-31
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 39
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mole if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mole profile →

pick disky if

  • You want the disky feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and disky fits your workflow better

full disky profile →

About Mole

Mole is an open source macOS utility that combines system cleanup, application management, and live monitoring into a single native app and CLI tool. It runs on macOS 12+ for both Intel and Apple Silicon, offering a unified interface for reclaiming disk space, uninstalling apps thoroughly, visualizing storage, and tracking real time system health. Built in Shell and licensed under GPL 3.0, it aggregates functionality found across several paid tools—CleanMyMac, AppCleaner, DaisyDisk, and iStat Menus—into one binary.

read the full Mole overview →

About disky

disky is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed Android filesystem analyzer written in Kotlin that shows you the usage of your storage, built for any Android user who wants to find the biggest space thieves on their device.

read the full disky overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

Mole vs nnn Mole vs Pearcleaner Mole vs BleachBit Mole vs dua-cli Mole vs gdu Mole vs RyTuneX Mole vs pomatez Mole vs memories Mole vs portabase Mole vs burrow Mole vs resticprofile Mole vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Mole or disky more popular?

Mole has 67,838 GitHub stars and disky has 952. Mole has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mole and disky free?

Both are open source. Mole is licensed under GPL-3.0 and disky under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mole and disky?

Mole is written in Shell and disky in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mole or disky?

Choose Mole if you want the larger community (67,838 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose disky if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.